Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Active Not Recruiting

Active Not RecruitingNCT02278601

Comparison of Regimens MPIB, CIPCEA, PCEA

Comparison of Modified Programmed Intermittent Bolus (MPIB), Computer-integrated Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (CIPCEA) and Conventional Patient Controlled Epidural Analgesia (PCEA) During Labour

Status
Active Not Recruiting
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
839 (actual)
Sponsor
KK Women's and Children's Hospital · Other Government
Sex
Female
Age
21 Years – 50 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard of pain relief for labour pain. Despite this, more than 50% of parturients continue to experience pain leading to suffering and increased caregiver workload. Women who have increased pain tend to have lower successful patient bolus demands when patient controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) is utilised and have dysfunctional labour requiring obstetric intervention such as Caesarean or instrumental delivery. Labour pain often escalates and worsens as labour progresses requiring an individualized, variable, flexible analgesic regimen. Bolus epidural administrations have been shown to improve uniform spread of local anaesthetics with better pain relief, compared to fixed background infusions.

Detailed description

The research team developed two novel epidural delivery regimens: computer-integrated PCEA (CIPCEA) and modified programmed intermittent bolus (MPIB) focused on individualization of analgesic requirements. This phase 3 double-blinded randomized controlled trial will compare the two novel regimens, and each with conventional PCEA with basal infusion (BI), in reducing breakthrough pain (failure of the regimen to provide adequate pain relief, necessitating unscheduled epidural supplementation) incidence as the primary outcome in nulliparous term women requesting labour epidural analgesia. In addition, a discrete choice experiment (DCE) in the format of a survey will be administered to estimate the women's preferences in treatment attributes related to epidural analgesia, including control over epidural dosage, chance of having breakthrough pain, motor block, instrumental delivery and out-of-pocket cost for epidural analgesia. We will also look into the association model for breakthrough pain that would take into account pre-delivery factors to better understand the mechanism of breakthrough pain during labor process.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEepidural delivery systemepidural delivery system for maintenance of labour epidural analgesia using 0.1% ropivacaine (amide local anaesthetic) with 2mcg/ml fentanyl (opioid) as maintenance solution
DRUGRopivacaineepidural delivery system for maintenance of labour epidural analgesia using 0.1% ropivacaine (amide local anaesthetic) with 2mcg/ml fentanyl (opioid) as maintenance solution
DRUGFentanylepidural delivery system for maintenance of labour epidural analgesia using 0.1% ropivacaine (amide local anaesthetic) with 2mcg/ml fentanyl (opioid) as maintenance solution

Timeline

Start date
2015-01-28
Primary completion
2019-05-06
Completion
2026-12-31
First posted
2014-10-30
Last updated
2024-10-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Singapore

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02278601. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.