NCT02277951

Intubation During Resuscitation

Comparison of Four Types of Laryngoscope for Tracheal Intubation During Chest Compressions

• Status: Completed
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 141 (actual)
• Sponsor: International Institute of Rescue Research and Education · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: —
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of four intubation devices ( in a cardiopulmonary scenario with uninterrupted chest compressions with a standardized manikin model. The investigators hypothesized that fiberoscope laryngoscopes may improve success rates.

Detailed description

Devices using in study: The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope (BONFILS)(KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA), The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope (RIFL)( AI Medical Devices, Inc., Williamston, MI, USA), The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope Blade Mac#3(C-MAC®S) (KARL STORZ Endovision, Inc., Charlton, MA, USA) The Macintosh Laryngoscope Blade no. 3 (MAC) (LifeLine Medical, Inc., Brooksville, FL, USA).

Conditions

• Intubation
• Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	The Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope	Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.
DEVICE	The Video Rigid Flexing Laryngoscope	Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.
DEVICE	The C-MAC® S Video Laryngoscope	Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.
DEVICE	The Macintosh Laryngoscope	Effectiveness and time to successful intubation will be measured.

Timeline

• Start date: 2014-05-01
• Primary completion: 2014-07-01
• Completion: 2014-07-01
• First posted: 2014-10-29
• Last updated: 2014-10-29