Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02264821

Wound Infusion vs Spinal Morphine for Post-caesarean Analgesia

Is Continuous Wound Infusion With Ropivacaine Better Than Intrathecal Morphine for Post-caesarean Analgesia? A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double Blinded Study

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
192 (actual)
Sponsor
Dr Madeleine Wilwerth · Academic / Other
Sex
Female
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The aim of this study is to compare effective analgesia with continuous wound infiltration of ropivacaine through multi-holed catheter or with morphine 100 mcg added intrathecally to spinal anesthesia, after elective Caesarean delivery.

Detailed description

Double blind, 3 groups * Control group: Rachi 0,1 ml saline, Infusion 300ml saline * Group rachi-morphine: 0,1ml =100µg morphine/300ml saline * Group KT: 0,1 ml saline/300 ml naropin 0.2%

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGropivacaine infiltrationwound infiltration
DRUGintrathecal morphine100 µg added to the spinal anaesthesia
DRUGplaceboplacebo in spinal anaesthesia and in wound infiltration

Timeline

Start date
2012-02-01
Primary completion
2014-08-01
Completion
2014-08-01
First posted
2014-10-15
Last updated
2015-06-09
Results posted
2015-06-09

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Belgium

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02264821. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.