Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02264821
Wound Infusion vs Spinal Morphine for Post-caesarean Analgesia
Is Continuous Wound Infusion With Ropivacaine Better Than Intrathecal Morphine for Post-caesarean Analgesia? A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled, Double Blinded Study
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 192 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Dr Madeleine Wilwerth · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of this study is to compare effective analgesia with continuous wound infiltration of ropivacaine through multi-holed catheter or with morphine 100 mcg added intrathecally to spinal anesthesia, after elective Caesarean delivery.
Detailed description
Double blind, 3 groups * Control group: Rachi 0,1 ml saline, Infusion 300ml saline * Group rachi-morphine: 0,1ml =100µg morphine/300ml saline * Group KT: 0,1 ml saline/300 ml naropin 0.2%
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | ropivacaine infiltration | wound infiltration |
| DRUG | intrathecal morphine | 100 µg added to the spinal anaesthesia |
| DRUG | placebo | placebo in spinal anaesthesia and in wound infiltration |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-08-01
- Completion
- 2014-08-01
- First posted
- 2014-10-15
- Last updated
- 2015-06-09
- Results posted
- 2015-06-09
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Belgium
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02264821. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.