Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02255214

Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Hemochron Signature Elite Point of Care Device Compared With Laboratory Assay

Evaluation of the Accuracy of the Hemochron Signature Elite Point of Care Micro Coagulation Instrument Compared With Laboratory Assay

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
24 (actual)
Sponsor
NHS Lothian · Other Government
Sex
All
Age
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Central Neuraxial Blockade (CNB) is commonly used in anaesthetics. It has several advantages over a general anaesthetic however contraindications include coagulopathy. Guidelines suggest a CNB should not be undertaken with an International Normalised Ratio (INR) of 1.5 or greater. A common cause of an elevated INR is warfarin therapy and regular monitoring of its effects is required. The Hemochron Signature Elite is a portable micro coagulation system that can be used as a point of care (POC) anticoagulation monitoring device. Marketing is focussed on its accuracy, convenience and efficiency in delivering a coagulation result. This study will assess the accuracy of this device in calculating the International Normalised Ratio (INR) result. This will be compared to another INR result obtained on the same sample via the current gold standard testing equipment in the Royal Infirmary Edinburgh (RIE) laboratories. The study will include patients presenting for surgery who have had their warfarin therapy stopped within the previous 7 days. Patients on warfarin therapy requiring surgery are currently identified in preoperative assessment clinics, on average 12 weeks prior to their date of surgery. Anecdotally there appears to be a difference between the 'expected' and actual INR when a POC device is used. Concern exists that patients may be inappropriately denied the potential benefits of central neural blockade (CNB) if a POC device provides a falsely high result, or conversely the investigators may be proceeding with CNB in patients with an unacceptably high INR if POC provides a falsely low result. There is also the possibility of improving hospital efficiency using this device as it provides a result much faster than the laboratory.

Conditions

Timeline

Start date
2013-10-01
Primary completion
2015-05-01
Completion
2015-05-01
First posted
2014-10-02
Last updated
2026-01-30
Results posted
2026-01-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02255214. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.