Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02210650
Trial Comparing Relapse Rates Between Standard Ureteroscopic Removal Of Ureteral Stone And Standard Removal With Additional Ureterorenic Clearing Of Non-Symptomatic Stones In The Kidney
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Relapse Rates Between Standard Ureteroscopic Removal Of Ureteral Stone And Standard Removal With Additional Ureterorenic Clearing Of Non-Symptomatic Stones In The Kidney
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 75 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Indiana Kidney Stone Institute · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 21 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Patients with a ureteral or kidney stone that causes symptoms, like pain, frequently have small kidney stones that don't cause symptoms. If these small kidney stones are determined to be asymptomatic (not causing any problems or pain), then most urologists will simply remove the symptomatic ureteral stone and leave the additional stones in the kidneys. However, symptomatic kidney stones started as small stones that didn't cause symptoms. This means that the small stones remaining in the patient's kidney may cause problems later. The purpose of our research is to test if removing small stones from the kidney prevents future stone episodes.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Symptomatic stone removal | Symptomatic stone removal by the surgical procedures called Ureteroscopy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy |
| PROCEDURE | Asymptomatic kidney stones and ureteral stone removed | Asymptomatic kidney stones and symptomatic stone removal by the surgical procedure called Ureteroscopy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-11-01
- Primary completion
- 2022-05-01
- Completion
- 2022-05-01
- First posted
- 2014-08-07
- Last updated
- 2022-05-25
Locations
4 sites across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02210650. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.