Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02210650

Trial Comparing Relapse Rates Between Standard Ureteroscopic Removal Of Ureteral Stone And Standard Removal With Additional Ureterorenic Clearing Of Non-Symptomatic Stones In The Kidney

Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Relapse Rates Between Standard Ureteroscopic Removal Of Ureteral Stone And Standard Removal With Additional Ureterorenic Clearing Of Non-Symptomatic Stones In The Kidney

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
75 (actual)
Sponsor
Indiana Kidney Stone Institute · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
21 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Patients with a ureteral or kidney stone that causes symptoms, like pain, frequently have small kidney stones that don't cause symptoms. If these small kidney stones are determined to be asymptomatic (not causing any problems or pain), then most urologists will simply remove the symptomatic ureteral stone and leave the additional stones in the kidneys. However, symptomatic kidney stones started as small stones that didn't cause symptoms. This means that the small stones remaining in the patient's kidney may cause problems later. The purpose of our research is to test if removing small stones from the kidney prevents future stone episodes.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURESymptomatic stone removalSymptomatic stone removal by the surgical procedures called Ureteroscopy or Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy
PROCEDUREAsymptomatic kidney stones and ureteral stone removedAsymptomatic kidney stones and symptomatic stone removal by the surgical procedure called Ureteroscopy

Timeline

Start date
2014-11-01
Primary completion
2022-05-01
Completion
2022-05-01
First posted
2014-08-07
Last updated
2022-05-25

Locations

4 sites across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02210650. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.