Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02210338
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope
A Comparison of the C-mac and Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope for Tracheal Intubation in Patients With a Simulated Difficult Airway
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 64 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Singapore General Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 21 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The study aims to determine the better device to facilitate intubation in patients with a limited neck movement and small mouth opening. This may help anesthesiology as well as emergency medicine practitioners and departments to decide when choosing between these two conceptually similar device. The hypothesis to be tested is that the C-MAC® is more superior when compared to the Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope in success of intubation, time to intubation and complication rate in patients with a fixed cervical collar.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Karl Storz C-MAC | |
| DEVICE | Bonfils Intubation Fibrescope |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-12-01
- Completion
- 2017-03-01
- First posted
- 2014-08-06
- Last updated
- 2016-04-28
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Singapore
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02210338. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.