Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02168881
Oral Misoprostol Versus Vaginal Dinoprostone For Induction Of Labour: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 342 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Ain Shams University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study is to compare between oral misoprostol in solution and vaginal dinoprostone in induction of labour in primiparous women with singleton pregnancy as regards efficiency and safety to both mother and fetus.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Misoprostol | |
| DRUG | Dinoprostone |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-01-01
- First posted
- 2014-06-20
- Last updated
- 2014-06-20
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02168881. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.