Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02130245
Acute Cholecystitis: Early Versus Delayed Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy; Randomized Prospective Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 600 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Mansoura University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The best management of the acute cholecystitis is to do laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The hypothesis is that to do it as an early intervention after patient admission is better than delayed cholecystectomy regarding the hospital stay, interval for antibiotic, the easiness of the operative maneuver reflected by operative time, conversion and intraoperative complications.
Detailed description
Doing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with acute cholecystitis as an early intervention after patient admission ( first group) or to do it after a while of treatment and conservation as a delayed cholecystectomy (second group) points of study include the hospital stay, interval for antibiotic, the easiness of the operative maneuver reflected by operative time, conversion and intraoperative complications.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Early cholecystectomy | Early laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis after admission |
| PROCEDURE | Delayed cholecystectomy | Laparoscopic cholecystectomy well be done after a period on conservation |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-01-01
- Completion
- 2016-01-01
- First posted
- 2014-05-05
- Last updated
- 2015-04-08
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Egypt
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02130245. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.