Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT02119871

Comparative Effectiveness of Unilateral vs. Bilateral Pulmonary Collapse in Cardiac De-airing

Comparative Effectiveness of Unilateral Versus Bilateral Pulmonary Collapse in De-airing During Open Left Heart Surgery.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
20 (actual)
Sponsor
Lund University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

To compare the effectiveness of unilateral pulmonary collapse (right lung) to bilateral pulmonary collapse for cardiac de-airing in open left-sided heart surgery.

Detailed description

Effective removal of air from the heart before termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is vital in open left heart surgery. Bilateral collapse of the lungs during cardiopulmonary bypass decreases the duration of the de-airing procedure, decreases residual air emboli monitored on Trans-esophageal Echocardiography (TEE) and decreases gaseous cerebral microemboli (MES) monitored by Trans-cranial Echo-Doppler (TCD) when compared to expanded lungs during (CPB). Induced pulmonary collapse by opening of the pleura and disconnection of the patient from the ventilator during CPB decreases the amount of air that can enter the pulmonary veins. Not all surgeons wish to induce lung collapse from fraught that it might lead to pulmonary ischemia or infection. It is unknown whether collapse of only the right lung is as effective as collapse of both lungs.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREBilateral Open PleuraeBoth pleurae are opened Right pulmonary vein drainage
PROCEDURERight Pleura OpenRight pleura open Left ventricular apical drainage

Timeline

Start date
2014-01-01
Primary completion
2014-06-01
Completion
2014-06-01
First posted
2014-04-22
Last updated
2018-01-29
Results posted
2018-01-29

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Sweden

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02119871. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.