Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT02073786

Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation

: Rigid Video Stylet Can Provide More Successful Intubation Than Conventional Lightwand Intubation in Patients With Cervical Spine Operation : A Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
168 (estimated)
Sponsor
Seoul National University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
20 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Lightwand is a useful alternative device for intubation but scooping movement can induce damage and microbleeding of oral mucosa, postoperative hoarseness,sore throat. Optiscope is rigid video stylet which has camera on distal tip of device. In many previous studies, rigid video stylet has proven advantages compared with other intubating devices.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICEConventional lightwand intubationConventional lightwand intubation technique will perform during intubation
DEVICERigid video styletRigid video stylet will inserted through endotracheal tube before induction. After induction with propofol and remifentanil using TIVA infusion pump, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg were used to facilitate intubation. After 2minutes, board-certificated anesthesiologist perform intubation using Optiscope.

Timeline

Start date
2014-10-01
Primary completion
2015-03-01
First posted
2014-02-27
Last updated
2015-02-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02073786. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.