Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT02073786
Rigid Video Stylet Vs Conventional Lightwand Intubation
: Rigid Video Stylet Can Provide More Successful Intubation Than Conventional Lightwand Intubation in Patients With Cervical Spine Operation : A Prospective Randomized Study
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 168 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Seoul National University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 20 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Lightwand is a useful alternative device for intubation but scooping movement can induce damage and microbleeding of oral mucosa, postoperative hoarseness,sore throat. Optiscope is rigid video stylet which has camera on distal tip of device. In many previous studies, rigid video stylet has proven advantages compared with other intubating devices.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Conventional lightwand intubation | Conventional lightwand intubation technique will perform during intubation |
| DEVICE | Rigid video stylet | Rigid video stylet will inserted through endotracheal tube before induction. After induction with propofol and remifentanil using TIVA infusion pump, rocuronium 0.6mg/kg were used to facilitate intubation. After 2minutes, board-certificated anesthesiologist perform intubation using Optiscope. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-03-01
- First posted
- 2014-02-27
- Last updated
- 2015-02-18
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02073786. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.