Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT02059954
Vaginal vs. Laparoscopic Hysterectomy
Vaginal Hysterectomy Versus Total Laparoscopic Hysterectomy for Benign Indications: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 100 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Medical University of Graz · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Hysterectomy for benign indication is one of the most common surgical procedures in women. Numerous reviews and guidelines recommend the vaginal approach for benign hysterectomy, but the proportion of laparoscopic (and robotic) hysterectomies is increasing. This study will compare a range of clinical and subjective outcomes of vaginal vs. total laparoscopic hysterectomy. Outcomes include operating time, postoperative recovery, return to work as well as cosmesis, quality of life and sexual health.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Hysterectomy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-08-01
- Completion
- 2017-09-01
- First posted
- 2014-02-11
- Last updated
- 2018-04-17
Locations
3 sites across 1 country: Austria
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02059954. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.