NCT02055430

Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage

Ureteral Stents Versus Percutaneous Nephrostomy for Initial Urinary Drainage in Children With Obstructive Anuria and Acute Renal Failure Due to Ureteral Calculi: a Prospective, Randomized Study

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 90 (actual)
• Sponsor: Cairo University · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 12 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus double J stent (JJ) as an initial urinary drainage in children

Detailed description

To compare percutaneous nephrostomy (PCN) versus double J stent (JJ) as an initial urinary drainage in children with obstructive calcular anuria and acute renal failure due to ureteric calculi to identify selection criteria for initial urinary drainage method to improve drainage, to decrease complications and to facilitate subsequent definitive clearance of stones as this comparison is lacking in literature

Conditions

• Children
• Obstructive Uropathy
• Acute Renal Failure
• Ureteric Stones

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	percutaneous nephrostomy insertion	The 1st arm was drained by PCN. This was performed under general anesthesia (GA) and fluoroscopic guidance.
PROCEDURE	bilateral double J ureteric stent	The 2nd arm was drained by bilateral JJ . This was performed under general anesthesia (GA) and fluoroscopic guidance.
PROCEDURE	Definitive stone management	(shockwave lithotripsy, chemodissolution therapy, ureteroscopy or open surgery) for clearance of stones.

Timeline

• Start date: 2010-03-01
• Primary completion: 2013-03-01
• Completion: 2013-09-01
• First posted: 2014-02-05
• Last updated: 2014-04-23
• Results posted: 2014-04-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Egypt