Trials / Terminated
TerminatedNCT02013869
Low Flow Anaesthesia, is There a Difference Between 2 Modern Anaesthetic Machines Using Different Gas Reservoir
Low Flow Anaesthesia; Cost-effectiveness of the Flow-I Anaesthesia Machine, a Comparison to Established Anaesthesia Delivery Unit
- Status
- Terminated
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 40 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Jan Jakobsson · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 65 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To study the Flow-I breathing circle during low flow general anaesthesia, whether this non-below system has advantages reduced time to reach Et 1MAC (minimal alveolar concentration) and lower consumption of inhaled agent
Detailed description
Assessing whether there are clinical differences in anaesthetic performance between standard anaesthesia workstation including a below and the new Flow-I device without a below
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Flow-I, a modern anaesthetic machine without a bag/below/gas reservoir for compression of insufflation gas | Desflurane Dialed setting 18 % on the machine gas vaporized |
| DEVICE | Asys, a anaesthetic machine with a bag/bellow for compression of gas to be insufflated | Desflurane dialed 18% on the machine gas vaporized |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2015-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-08-01
- Completion
- 2017-08-01
- First posted
- 2013-12-17
- Last updated
- 2024-03-19
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Sweden
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT02013869. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.