NCT01998360

Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision

Rapid, Minimally-invasive Voluntary Adult Male Circumcision: a Quasi-experimental Study

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 100 (actual)
• Sponsor: Simunye Primary Health Care · Academic / Other
• Sex: Male
• Age: 18 Years – 99 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Accepted

Summary

This study will evaluate a new, minimally-invasive surgical circumcision technique for men, which is easy to learn and perform, is safe, and is associated with high patient satisfaction and excellent cosmetic results.

Detailed description

Voluntary medical male circumcision (VMMC) is a priority preventive intervention for HIV transmission. Currently, the most widely used VMMC technique in South Africa is open surgical circumcision. According to the Framework for Clinical Evaluation of Devices for Adult Male Circumcision (WHO, 2011): "WHO and other health authorities wish to identify one or more devices that (a) would make the VMMC safer, easier, and quicker; (b) would have more rapid healing than current methods and/or might entail less risk of HIV transmission in the post-operative period; (c) could be performed safely by health-care providers with a minimal level of training; and (d) would be cost-effective compared to standard surgical methods for male circumcision scale up." This quasi-experimental compares the open surgical technique to an alternative minimally-invasive technique using the disposable Unicirc device with tissue adhesive. The controls come from a separate randomized controlled trial (Unicirc 001) that was conducted just prior to the Unicirc 002 case series of 50 subjects. The investigators postulate that VMMC using the Unicirc device meets WHO criteria for the ideal method to scale up: it is an easier technique to learn and perform, requires less intraoperative time, is safer for both surgeons and patients, heals quicker, and is more cost effective than other currently available techniques. The disposable nature of the device is an immense advantage as it eliminates the need to sterilize and can therefore be used in resource-limited settings. It also reduces the chances of infection caused by contaminated instruments.

Conditions

• Circumcision

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Surgical Control	The study is quasi-experimental, because the open surgical controls are not contemporaneous. They were performed at the same center as part of Unicirc 001 trial with the same conditions as the subsequent 50 Unicirc circumcisions.
PROCEDURE	Unicirc with tissue adhesive	Excision of foreskin with Unicirc device and wound sealing with tissue adhesive

Timeline

• Start date: 2013-10-01
• Primary completion: 2013-10-01
• Completion: 2013-10-01
• First posted: 2013-11-28
• Last updated: 2018-10-02
• Results posted: 2014-01-15

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Africa