Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Terminated

TerminatedNCT01986946

Epidural Analgesia Versus IV Analgesia in Lumbar Spine Fusions

A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia With Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study

Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
17 (actual)
Sponsor
Duke University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

1. Protocol Title - A Comparison of Epidural Analgesia with Standard Care Following Lumbar Spinal Fusion: A Prospective Randomized Study 2. Purpose of the Study - This prospective randomized study will enroll 200 patients undergoing elective Lumbar Spinal Fusion at Duke University Hospital. The primary objective is to determine the effect of epidural analgesia, as compared with standard care, on post-operative analgesia. Hypothesis: The investigators hypothesize that patients undergoing Lumbar Spinal Fusion surgery with epidural catheter placement will have superior post-operative analgesia compared to patients undergoing standard care.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
OTHEREpidural Catheter - DilaudidPlacement of an epidural catheter to administer local anesthetic and opioid (dilaudid) to the epidural space will be studied as compared to use of intravenous opioid (dilaudid) for pain control following lumbar spine fusion surgery.
DRUGDilaudidPatients in this arm will receive intravenous patient-controlled opioid analgesia (Dilaudid).

Timeline

Start date
2013-10-01
Primary completion
2015-09-01
Completion
2015-09-01
First posted
2013-11-19
Last updated
2017-02-23
Results posted
2016-11-11

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01986946. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.