Trials / Terminated
TerminatedNCT01980173
Medico-economic Comparison of Postpartum Hemorrhage Management Using the Bakri Balloon and Standard Care
- Status
- Terminated
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 26 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nīmes · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study concerns women diagnosed with postpartum hemorrhage and requiring sulprostone therapy. Included patients are randomized to two arms: the "Sulprostone + Bakri balloon" arm versus the "Sulprostone alone" arm. The main objective of this study is to compare the efficiency of a care strategy including the Bakri balloon to that of routine care without the Bakri balloon via a cost-consequence study juxtaposing costs and the necessity of invasive procedures (arterial embolization, ligation of arteries, hysterectomy, intrauterine sutures) for controlling postpartum hemorrhage.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Routine care | Following diagnosis with post-partum hemorrhage, an initial 30 minute phase corresponding to current recommendations, an injection of sulprostone, a demonstrated inefficacy of sulprostone 20 minutes after the injection and finally randomization, patients in this arm of the study will continue to have routine care. |
| DEVICE | Bakri balloon | Following diagnosis with post-partum hemorrhage, an initial 30 minute phase corresponding to current recommendations, an injection of sulprostone, a demonstrated inefficacy of sulprostone 20 minutes after the injection and finally randomization, patients in this arm will be treated with the immediate placement of a Bakri balloon, followed by routine care if necessary. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-09-05
- Primary completion
- 2016-09-26
- Completion
- 2017-03-30
- First posted
- 2013-11-08
- Last updated
- 2018-05-11
Locations
7 sites across 1 country: France
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01980173. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.