Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01965249
Effect of Stitch Technique on the Occurrence of Incisional Hernia After Abdominal Wall Closure
Short Stitch Versus Long Stitch Suture Technique Using Monomax® for Abdominal Wall Closure After Primary Median Laparotomy. A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blinded, Multicenter, International Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 425 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Aesculap AG · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The major long term complication of abdominal wall closure after a median laparotomy is the development of an incisional hernia. Several suture technique and suture material have been used but the incidence of this complication still lies between 9 -20%. Synthetic suture material which have become available over the last decades have the advantage that they are degraded by the body system and fully absorbed within 70-180 days; however they loss 50% of their initial strength already after 14-30 days and may not be the optimal suture material for abdominal wall closure. A new suture material (Monomax®) was developed with an extra-long absorption profile, high elasticity and with a superior initial strength. Therefore, the ESTOIH-Study was designed to investigate the influence of the stitch length on the occurrence of incisional hernia using the extra-long term absorbable, elastic, monofilament suture (Monomax®).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Long stitch | AWC with the long stitch technique using MonoMax USP 1, 150 cm loop, HR48 mm |
| DEVICE | Short Stitch | Short stitch suture technique using MonoMax USP 2/0, 150 cm, HR26 mm |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2014-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-12-15
- Completion
- 2024-12-12
- First posted
- 2013-10-18
- Last updated
- 2025-09-08
Locations
9 sites across 2 countries: Austria, Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01965249. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.