Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01951677
Safety and Efficacy Study of Adjuvanted Prophylactic Hepatitis B Vaccine
Phase 1 Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Study to Compare the Safety and Effectiveness of Hepatitis B Vaccines in Individuals With Renal Impairment, Diabetes Mellitus or Age Greater Than 40 Years
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 240 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Vaxine Pty Ltd · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
There is a need for more effective and better-tolerated hepatitis B vaccines for low responder high-risk populations including patients with renal impairment and/or diabetes mellitus and those aged over 40 years. Several approaches are available to enhance the potency of hepatitis B virus vaccines including use of the more highly immunogenic antigens, replacing alum with potentially more effective adjuvants, and increasing the dose of vaccine antigen. A combination of these strategies is being tested in this study to identify the most promising candidate approaches to take forward into advanced clinical development
Detailed description
Adjuvants are a critical ingredient in most vaccines and act by boosting the immune response to the target protein (e.g. hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)). Despite considerable research, aluminium hydroxide or phosphate compounds (collectively referred to as "alum") remain the dominant adjuvants used in human hepatitis B virus vaccines. There is thus an unmet need for new HBV vaccine adjuvants, in particular, for adjuvants capable of boosting cell-mediated immunity (this is a particular type of immune response where killer T cells are activated that are then able to attack and destroy the infection) as alum, although good at stimulating antibodies is very poor at stimulating cell-mediated immunity. Alum, whilst generally accepted as safe, can be associated with significant local vaccine reactions and this is another reason why newer better-tolerated vaccine adjuvants would be beneficial. This study will compare a range of experimental adjuvant formulations to identify those that provide the safest and most effective enhancement of T- and B-cell immunity against hepatitis B
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | HBsAg | Standard hepatitis B vaccine antigen |
| BIOLOGICAL | PreS HBsAg | preS hepatitis B surface antigen |
| BIOLOGICAL | Advax-1(TM) | Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen |
| BIOLOGICAL | Advax-2(TM) | Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen |
| BIOLOGICAL | Advax-3(TM) | Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen |
| BIOLOGICAL | Alum | Adjuvant formulated with vaccine antigen |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-07-01
- Primary completion
- 2017-10-01
- Completion
- 2019-05-01
- First posted
- 2013-09-27
- Last updated
- 2019-05-07
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Australia
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01951677. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.