Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01939938

Pilot Study of the Comparison of the Upper Airway Dynamics of Oronasal vs Nasal Masks With PAP Treatment

Pilot Study of the Comparison of the Upper Airway Dynamics of Oronasal vs Nasal Masks With Positive Airway Pressure Treatment

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
10 (actual)
Sponsor
Weill Medical College of Cornell University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
Accepted

Summary

Our group has recently found that the choice of positive airway pressure mask can significantly affect the pressure required to adequately treat sleep disordered breathing. The goal of this study is to visualize the upper airway in the retropalatal and retroglossal region while using both oronasal and nasal masks with CPAP in order to investigate differences in upper airway dynamics that may occur between these two mask types.

Detailed description

It is known that oronasal masks are not as effective at opening the upper airway compared to nasal only continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) masks in patients with sleep-disordered breathing. However, the physiological mechanism for this difference in efficacy is not known; although, it has been hypothesized to involve the retroglossal and/or retropalatal region of the upper airway. The objective of this study was to investigate differences in retroglossal and retropalatal anterior-posterior space with the use of oronasal vs. nasal CPAP masks using real-time cine magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI).

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DEVICENasal and Oronasal PAP MaskSubjects will be imaged via MRI wearing a nasal and oronasal PAP mask at 5, 10 and 15 cm H20.

Timeline

Start date
2013-06-01
Primary completion
2015-04-01
Completion
2015-04-01
First posted
2013-09-11
Last updated
2018-07-17
Results posted
2017-06-14

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01939938. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.