Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01932359
Rapidly Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures for Mohs Surgery Repair on the Face: a Randomized Controlled Split-scar Study
Rapidly Absorbable Versus Non-absorbable Sutures for Mohs Surgery Repair on the Face: a Randomized Controlled Split-scar Study (RAVNAS)
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 105 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of British Columbia · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This study aims to compare scar outcomes between rapidly absorbable and non-absorbable sutures (stitches) for the closure of wounds after skin cancer removal on the face.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | rapidly absorbable suture (Vicryl Rapide) | |
| OTHER | non-absorbable suture (Ethilon) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-03-01
- Completion
- 2014-11-01
- First posted
- 2013-08-30
- Last updated
- 2015-04-13
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01932359. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.