Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01916473
Epidural Versus Continuous Wound Ropivacaine Infusion Analgesia
Epidural Versus Continuous Wound Ropivacaine Infusion: Effect on Acute and Chronic Pain After Myomectomy or Total Abdominal Hysterectomy. A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 80 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of Athens · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 25 Years – 60 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Study Hypothesis: The analgesic requirements and pain scores postoperatively differ between the epidural and continuous wound infusion techniques.
Detailed description
The analgesic requirements and pain scores postoperatively differ between the epidural and continuous wound infusion techniques, in patients undergoing myomectomy or hysterectomy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Epidural analgesia | Epidural analgesia is provided with ropvacaine 0.2% given 6 hourly |
| OTHER | Continuous wound infusion | Continuous wound infusion via catheter |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-11-01
- Completion
- 2012-11-01
- First posted
- 2013-08-05
- Last updated
- 2013-08-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Greece
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01916473. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.