Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01886521
Use of Lumbar Drain to Remove Clots in Patients Admitted to the Neuro-ICU After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.
Use of Lumbar Drain Versus Ventricular Drain to Remove Clots in Patients Admitted to the Neuro-ICU After Subarachnoid Hemorrhage (a Randomized Trial).
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 20 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Odense University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Recently, a clinical trial showed that the use of lumbar drains compared to ventricular drain in patients suffering from subarachnoid hemorrhage resulted in less delayed ischemic neurological deficits but failed to show a clinical benefit after 6 months. The underlying assumption was, that the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) obtained from lumbar drains has a higher concentration of blood than CSF from lumbar drains. The investigators decided to test this assumption. In this study, the investigators will randomize patients to either placement of a ventricular or a lumbar drain and analyze the CSF drainage on a daily basis.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Lumbar drain | |
| PROCEDURE | Ventricular drain |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-06-01
- Completion
- 2016-09-01
- First posted
- 2013-06-26
- Last updated
- 2014-10-21
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Denmark
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01886521. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.