Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01873144
High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis
High Flow Therapy vs Hypertonic Saline in Bronchiolitis Treatment. Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 75 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Ministry of Health, Spain · Other Government
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 6 Months
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of this study is to demonstrate that heated, humidified, high-flow nasal cannula (HHHFNC) is superior to hypertonic saline solution (HSS) in the treatment of moderate acute viral bronchiolitis in infants in improving respiratory distress and comfort and reducing length of hospital stay (LOS) and admission to Pediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Epinephrine 1/1000 | Nebulization of 0.5 mL/kg (maximum 3 mL) of epinephrine 1/1000 every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria |
| DRUG | HSS 3% | Nebulization 2 mL of HSS (3%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria |
| DEVICE | HHHFNC | Precision Flow (Vapotherm Inc. Stevensville, Maryland, US ) and RT329 (Fisher and Paykel Healthcare, Auckland, New Zealand) were the dispositive used depending on the availability. Fisher and Paykel nasal cannula was used in both devices, depending on age |
| DRUG | NS (0.9%) | Nebulization of 2 mL of NS (0.9%)+ epinephrine every 4h for three times and afterwards at physician in charge criteria |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-12-01
- Completion
- 2012-12-01
- First posted
- 2013-06-07
- Last updated
- 2013-06-07
Locations
2 sites across 1 country: Spain
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01873144. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.