Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01825733

Comparison of Palonosetron and Ramosetron for Preventing Patient-controlled Analgesia Related Nausea and Vomiting Following Spine Surgery

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
196 (actual)
Sponsor
Yonsei University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
20 Years – 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Postoperative pain, the great concern for the patients undergoing spine surgery, has led to common use of opioid-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia (IV-PCA) postoperatively. Opioid-based IV-PCA offers better pain control, which could facilitate early recovery, rehabilitation and increase patient satisfaction. However, its use inevitably increases the incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), another great discomfort, as high as 80% in patients with multiple risk factors.Therefore, there have been consistent efforts to prevent PONV with multimodal therapies such as risk stratification, modification and preventive use of antiemetics. Of all antiemetics, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT3) antagonist, especially ondansetron, is most commonly used and extensively studied to reduce PONV because of its efficacy and fewer side effects.\[8\] However, its efficacy is not quite satisfactory when it comes to PONV associated with opioid-based IV-PCA. Recently, there are many reports comparing the antiemetic efficacy between ondansetron and the 2 newly developed 5-HT3 antagonists, ramosetron and palonosetron. Ramosetron is known to have a higher affinity and longer duration of binding to 5-HT3 receptor, therefore exhibits potent and sustained anti-emetic effect than previously developed 5-HT3 antagonists.Palonosetron has a unique allosteric binding to the 5-HT3 receptor, which brings a higher affinity, longer duration of action and longer elimination half-time.According to the previous studies, both ramosetron and palonosetron showed superior antiemetic efficacy for PONV associated with opioid-based IV-PCA to ondansetron as expected by their theoretical advantages. However, it has never been evaluated which one has superior antiemetic efficacy for opioid-based IV-PCA associated PONV. Therefore, in this study, we tried to evaluate the relative antiemetic efficacy of ramosetron and palonosetron in controlling opioid-based IV-PCA related PONV.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
DRUGramosetronRamosetron 0.3 mg was mixed to the PCA. Same dose of drug was administered 10 minutes before the end of surgery according to the allocated group.
DRUGpalonosetronpalonosetrno 0.075 mg was mixed to the PCA. Same dose of drug was administered 10 minutes before the end of surgery according to the allocated group.

Timeline

Start date
2011-08-01
Primary completion
2012-07-01
Completion
2012-07-01
First posted
2013-04-08
Last updated
2014-02-19

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01825733. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.