Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT01810224

Graft Patency After FFR-guided Versus Angio-guided CABG (GRAFFITI) Trial

Graft Patency After FFR-guided Versus Angio-guided CABG: a Prospective, Multicenter, Multinational, Randomized (1:1) Controlled Trial

Status
Unknown
Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
206 (estimated)
Sponsor
Onze Lieve Vrouw Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

This is prospective, randomized, multicenter, multinational, randomized (1:1) study. The aim of this study is to assess the importance of functional assessment of coronary artery disease prior to bypass surgery. In particular, an FFR-guided strategy will be compared to the traditional Angio-guided strategy in the guidance of surgical revascularization by aorto-coronary bypass grafting.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURESurgical revascularizationThe final intervention (surgical revascularization) will be the same for both arms.

Timeline

Start date
2013-03-01
Primary completion
2015-12-01
First posted
2013-03-13
Last updated
2013-03-13

Locations

3 sites across 3 countries: Belgium, Czechia, Hungary

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01810224. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Graft Patency After FFR-guided Versus Angio-guided CABG (GRAFFITI) Trial (NCT01810224) · Clinical Trials Directory