Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01776866

Image Content Analysis of Dural-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography

Comparison of Image Content Assessment Between Dural-axis Rotational and Standard Coronary Angiography

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
70 (actual)
Sponsor
General Hospital of Chinese Armed Police Forces · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The investigators hypothesized that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography was non-inferior to standard coronary angiography with respect to diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Detailed description

The prior studies have demonstrated that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) is associated with lower contrast usage and radiation exposure compared with standard coronary angiography (SA). Single-axis rotational coronary angiography (RA) has been proved by previous studies without any reduction in diagnostic accuracy compared to SA. However, the rotational protocol is obvious different between DARCA and single-axis RA. A recent study has assessed the diagnostic accuracy of DARCA, but this study was not designed for image content analysis and the number of patients included did not provide sufficient statistical power to allow a valid comparison of DARCA with SA. The diagnostic accuracy of DARCA aroused our attention.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDURECoronary AngiographyCoronary angiography include standard coronary angiography (SA) and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA). Patient first undergo SA of either left or right coronary system followed by DARCA.

Timeline

Start date
2013-01-01
Primary completion
2013-05-01
Completion
2013-05-01
First posted
2013-01-28
Last updated
2015-06-30

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01776866. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.