Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01776866
Image Content Analysis of Dural-axis Rotational Versus Standard Coronary Angiography
Comparison of Image Content Assessment Between Dural-axis Rotational and Standard Coronary Angiography
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 70 (actual)
- Sponsor
- General Hospital of Chinese Armed Police Forces · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators hypothesized that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography was non-inferior to standard coronary angiography with respect to diagnosis of coronary artery disease.
Detailed description
The prior studies have demonstrated that dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA) is associated with lower contrast usage and radiation exposure compared with standard coronary angiography (SA). Single-axis rotational coronary angiography (RA) has been proved by previous studies without any reduction in diagnostic accuracy compared to SA. However, the rotational protocol is obvious different between DARCA and single-axis RA. A recent study has assessed the diagnostic accuracy of DARCA, but this study was not designed for image content analysis and the number of patients included did not provide sufficient statistical power to allow a valid comparison of DARCA with SA. The diagnostic accuracy of DARCA aroused our attention.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Coronary Angiography | Coronary angiography include standard coronary angiography (SA) and dual-axis rotational coronary angiography (DARCA). Patient first undergo SA of either left or right coronary system followed by DARCA. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2013-01-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-05-01
- Completion
- 2013-05-01
- First posted
- 2013-01-28
- Last updated
- 2015-06-30
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01776866. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.