Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01752725
Comparison of BiCision® Versus UltraCision® During Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LASH)
Comparison of BiCision® Versus UltraCision® During Laparoscopic Supracervical Hysterectomy (LASH): A Prospective, Controlled, Randomized, Non-inferiority in Vivo Human Study.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 30 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital Tuebingen · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The aim of the study is the evaluation of the efficiency and safety of the new, CE-certified thermofu-sion and dissection instrument BiCision® in comparison with the long established Ultracision® Har-monic Scalpel(Ethicon)during a laparoscopic supracervical hysterectomy (LASH).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | BiCision® | |
| DEVICE | Ultracision® Har-monic Scalpel(Ethicon) |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-10-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-04-01
- Completion
- 2012-04-01
- First posted
- 2012-12-19
- Last updated
- 2012-12-19
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01752725. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.