Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01738919

Extension Block Technique Versus Splinting in Mallet Finger Fracture.

Ishiguro Extension Block Technique Versus Splinting in the Treatment of Mallet Finger Fracture. A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
32 (actual)
Sponsor
University of Aarhus · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Mallet finger is an avulsion of the extensor tendon at its insertion on the base of the distal phalanx, with or without fracture. Treatment af mallet finger fractures involving more than 1/3 of the articulating surface is controversial. There are to our knowledge no randomized controlled trials comparing splinting and surgical treatment with extension block technique. The aim of this study is to compare splinting and surgical extension block fixation of mallet finger fractures in a randomized controlled trial.Our hypothesis is that conservative treatment with splinting is comparable to surgical treatment concerning functional outcome, and may even reduce the complication rates. The original protocol was designed to include participants with non-subluxated and subluxated mallet finger fractures. However this study only included participants with non-subluxated fingers.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREConservative treatment with splinting for 6 weeks.Aluminum Karstam splints are used.
PROCEDUREOperative treatment with extension block techniqueSurgery with extension block technique. 6 weeks.

Timeline

Start date
2011-04-01
Primary completion
2015-05-01
Completion
2016-09-01
First posted
2012-11-30
Last updated
2016-11-04
Results posted
2016-11-04

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Denmark

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01738919. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.