Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01738919
Extension Block Technique Versus Splinting in Mallet Finger Fracture.
Ishiguro Extension Block Technique Versus Splinting in the Treatment of Mallet Finger Fracture. A Randomized Controlled Trial.
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 32 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of Aarhus · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Mallet finger is an avulsion of the extensor tendon at its insertion on the base of the distal phalanx, with or without fracture. Treatment af mallet finger fractures involving more than 1/3 of the articulating surface is controversial. There are to our knowledge no randomized controlled trials comparing splinting and surgical treatment with extension block technique. The aim of this study is to compare splinting and surgical extension block fixation of mallet finger fractures in a randomized controlled trial.Our hypothesis is that conservative treatment with splinting is comparable to surgical treatment concerning functional outcome, and may even reduce the complication rates. The original protocol was designed to include participants with non-subluxated and subluxated mallet finger fractures. However this study only included participants with non-subluxated fingers.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Conservative treatment with splinting for 6 weeks. | Aluminum Karstam splints are used. |
| PROCEDURE | Operative treatment with extension block technique | Surgery with extension block technique. 6 weeks. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2015-05-01
- Completion
- 2016-09-01
- First posted
- 2012-11-30
- Last updated
- 2016-11-04
- Results posted
- 2016-11-04
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Denmark
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01738919. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.