Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01688687

Conventional Biopsies vs pCLE for Diagnosis of Superficial Gastric Neoplasia

The Accuracy of Probe-based Confocal Endomicroscopy Versus Conventional Biopsies for the Diagnosis of Superficial Gastric Neoplasias

Status
Completed
Phase
Study type
Observational
Enrollment
63 (actual)
Sponsor
Soonchunhyang University Hospital · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

Confocal endomicroscopy (CLE) allows real-time in-vivo high-resolution and high-magnification imaging of the gastrointestinal epithelium, which is comparable to histopathology. Previous studies have investigated the accuracy of pCLE for diagnosis and differentiated of colorectal polyps, Barrett's esophagus and pancreaticobiliary strictures. However, to date there are limited data exploring the application of pCLE to gastric lesions, and this is the first study comparing the diagnosis of conventional forceps biopsy with that of pCLE using the final specimens obtained from endoscopic resection as a reference standard. The aims of this study were (1) the accuracy of pCLE compared to conventional forceps biopsy using histopathology results following endoscopic resection as a reference, and (2) comparison of "real time" in-vivo pCLE diagnosis with that of blinded "off-line" pCLE diagnosis, and off-line interobserver agreement.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREEndoscopic submucosal dissection

Timeline

Start date
2012-02-01
Primary completion
2012-09-01
First posted
2012-09-20
Last updated
2012-09-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: South Korea

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01688687. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.