Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01682629
Examining the Effect of a Scripted Debriefing on Resuscitation Performance in Pediatrics
Examining Pediatric Resuscitation Education Using Simulation and Scripted Debriefing: A Multicenter, Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 443 (actual)
- Sponsor
- KidSIM Simulation Program · Network
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
The investigative team's purpose for conducting this research is to improve effective and efficient translation and implementation of evidence based advanced life support practice to providers of care for children. This specific project aims to accomplish 2 major goals. The investigators aim to evaluate the utility of a debriefing script specifically designed to facilitate debriefing when used by novice Pediatric Advanced Life Support instructors during low and high realism simulation-based learning. Secondly, the investigators hope to evaluate the effectiveness of high realism simulation vs. low realism simulation in achieving PALS-based educational outcomes, such as knowledge and skill acquisition. The investigators hypothesize that SCRIPTED debriefing by novice instructors following low and high fidelity simulation-based learning will : 1. Improve the cognitive performance and knowledge of multidisciplinary team members as assessed by a cognitive performance tool and multiple choice testing compared with more traditional, NON-SCRIPTED debriefing; 2. Improve the behavioural, teamwork and communication skills of multidisciplinary team members as assessed by a validated assessment tool compared with more traditional, NON-SCRIPTED debriefing; The investigators hypothesize that HIGH REALISM simulation-based learning will: 1. Improve the cognitive performance and knowledge of multidisciplinary team members as assessed by a cognitive performance tool and multiple choice testing compared with more traditional, LOW REALISM simulation; 2. Improve the behavioural, teamwork and communication skills of multidisciplinary team members as assessed by a validated assessment tool compared with more traditional, LOW REALISM simulation;
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Debriefing Script | A debriefing script was designed for novice instructors to facilitate a 20-minute debriefing session. It was developed in iterative steps: (a) review of PALS learning objectives; (b) categorization of script content; (c) development of scripted language; (d) formatting into a cognitive aid and (e) pilot testing script for usability with subsequent edits before implementation in the study. All novice instructors received the scenario 2 weeks prior to the study session. Instructors randomized to scripted debriefing were also given the script with no instruction on how to use it except on the day of the study, to use and follow the script as closely as possible during the debriefing session. All instructors held a clipboard while observing the simulation session; to hold the debriefing script and/or take notes. This allowed for blinding of the video reviewers as to which study arm the team had been randomized. Debriefing sessions were limited to 20-minutes in duration. |
| OTHER | High Physical Realism Simulation | High vs. Low Physical Realism Simulators A pre-programmed infant simulator was used for all simulation sessions. To create "high" physical realism (HiR), full simulator functions were activated ("turned on") including vital sign monitoring, audio feedback, breath sounds, chest rise, heart sounds, palpable pulses, and vocalization. "Low" physical realism (LoR) groups had the identical simulator but the compressor was "turned off", thus eliminating physical findings described above. In addition, the LoR simulator was connected to a monitor, but it only displayed the cardiac rhythm, and not pulse oximetry, respiratory rate, blood pressure, temperature and audio feedback present in the HiR group. All other aspects of the simulated resuscitation environment were standardized for all groups. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-02-01
- Completion
- 2011-02-01
- First posted
- 2012-09-11
- Last updated
- 2012-09-11
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Canada
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01682629. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.