Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01638000
A Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Patients With Overactive Bladder Who Were Previously Treated With Another Medicine But Were Not Satisfied With That Treatment.
A Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel Group, Multi-Centre Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Mirabegron Compared to Solifenacin in Subjects With Overactive Bladder (OAB) Treated With Antimuscarinics and Dissatisfied Due to Lack of Efficacy
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 1,887 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Astellas Pharma Europe Ltd. · Industry
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The purpose of the study was to assess the efficacy, safety and tolerability of mirabegron 50 mg versus (vs) solifenacin 5 mg in the treatment of patients with OAB who were dissatisfied with their treatment due to lack of efficacy.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Mirabegron | oral tablet |
| DRUG | Solifenacin succinate | oral tablet |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-06-12
- Primary completion
- 2013-04-24
- Completion
- 2013-04-24
- First posted
- 2012-07-11
- Last updated
- 2024-11-21
- Results posted
- 2016-08-30
Locations
217 sites across 33 countries: Armenia, Austria, Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Canada, Czechia, Denmark, Finland, France, Georgia, Germany, Greece, Hungary, Ireland, Italy, Kazakhstan, Latvia, Lebanon, Lithuania, Netherlands, Norway, Poland, Portugal, Russia, Slovakia, Slovenia, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Turkey (Türkiye), Ukraine, United Kingdom
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01638000. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.