Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01634971
External Drainage Versus Internal Drainage of Pancreatic Duct With a Stent After Pancreaticoduodenectomy (EDIDPD)
Phase II Study of External Drainage Versus Internal Drainage of Pancreatic Duct With a Stent
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) and other surgical complications are common after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD) and POPF is a major complication. The drainage of pancreatic duct is important and a stent is usually placed in the operation, but it is still controversial whether the stent drainage is internal or external.
Detailed description
The current study is to compare the rate of Postoperative pancreatic fistula(POPF) and other surgical complications after pancreatoduodenectomy (PD).
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Internal Drainage of Pancreatic Duct after pancreatomy | the Intervention name is: Internal Drainage of Pancreatic Duct after pancreatomy, a stent was placed in the pancreatic duct, external drainage of the stent is defined as control group(the stent will be tans-abdomen and as a drainage of pancreatic fluid), and internal drainage of the stent is defined as interventional(or experimental) group, with the stent very short(2cm) and placed in jejunum. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-05-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-12-01
- Completion
- 2016-12-01
- First posted
- 2012-07-06
- Last updated
- 2016-02-17
Locations
1 site across 1 country: China
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01634971. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.