Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Unknown

UnknownNCT01622179

Outcome of Two Different Suture Methods for Achilles Tendon Rupture

Closed Achilles Tendon Rupture Treats by Two Different Suture Methods and the Outcome

Status
Unknown
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40 (estimated)
Sponsor
Peifu Tang · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years – 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to estimate the effective of two suture methods in the treatment of Achilles rupture.

Detailed description

Achilles tendon rupture is one of the most common tendon injuries in the adult population. The incidence of this injury is increasing as aging adults continue their participation in high-demand sports. Although the impact of an Achilles tendon rupture is substantial, often resulting in prolonged disability and rehabilitation. Studies have showed that the operation treatment of acute Achilles tendon ruptures had some advantages. But the rebuild of blood supply was not involved in previous studies. And the epitenon of tendon is the interior layer, closest to the endotenons which contains the vascular supply. Main difference of two suture methods were if the epitenon was repaired and sewed indirectly or unrepaired and sewed directly.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREsewed indirectlyThe epitenon was repaired and sewed indirectly.
PROCEDUREsewed directlyThe epitenon was unrepaired and sewed directly.

Timeline

Start date
2012-06-01
Primary completion
2013-05-01
Completion
2013-06-01
First posted
2012-06-19
Last updated
2013-02-20

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01622179. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Outcome of Two Different Suture Methods for Achilles Tendon Rupture (NCT01622179) · Clinical Trials Directory