NCT01620541

Comparing Ankle Fusion to Ankle Replacement

Comparing Ankle Arthrodesis to Ankle Arthroplasty

• Status: Active Not Recruiting
• Phase: —
• Study type: Observational
• Enrollment: 516 (actual)
• Sponsor: Seattle Institute for Biomedical and Clinical Research · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 21 Years – 89 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

End-stage ankle arthritis (ESAA) is a debilitating condition associated with severe pain, dysfunction, and reduced quality of life. Many patients with ESAA have difficulty walking for even 100 feet or up a single flight of stairs. Patients seeking surgery for ESAA have two primary treatment options: ankle arthrodesis (i.e., ankle fusion) and ankle arthroplasty (i.e., ankle replacement). Few studies have directly compared the effectiveness of these two procedures, and no randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have been performed. The investigators will compare the following in subjects undergoing ankle arthrodesis and ankle arthroplasty before surgery, and post-surgery at 3 and 6 months, and on an annual basis up to ten years. 1. Overall physical function and ankle specific function 2. Ankle pain intensity and interference with activities 3. Activity levels 4. Overall general health 5. Post-surgical complication rates The investigators will also identify prognostic factors that are predictive of higher physical function, ankle specific function, reduced pain, improved general health, and overall patient satisfaction.

Detailed description

From study inception until March 2014, the investigators conducted a multi-site randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing the effectiveness of ankle arthrodesis and ankle arthroplasty over a 2-year follow-up period. The study used a modified Comprehensive Cohort Design. Subjects unwilling to randomize to surgery could still participate in the study by entering into the preference cohort and select surgery in consultation with their surgeon. By March 2014, no subjects had entered into the randomized cohort. The Data and Safety Monitoring Board (DSMB) recommended stopping recruitment in the randomized arm of the study since no subjects were willing to randomize to surgery. All patients were enrolled in the preference cohort and selected arthrodesis or arthroplasty. Despite the change in study design, the objectives remain unchanged.

Conditions

• End-stage Ankle Arthritis (ESAA)
• Osteoarthritis (OA)

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Ankle Arthrodesis	All surgeons will employ a well-established technique of rigid internal fixation. In this technique, the joint is prepared by removing cartilage from the surfaces, the bones are positioned as desired, and screws and/or a plate are attached to compress the bones together and prevent motion. This technique obviates the need for a cast or external support. Patients are allowed to walk with weight bearing aids immediately. Radiographs are performed at 6 weeks to determine weight bearing status. Weight is allowed on the limb in increments over the 6 to 12 weeks after surgery.
PROCEDURE	Ankle Arthroplasty	Protocols are similar among participating centers. Each surgeon uses an anterior surgical approach between the tibialis anterior tendon and the toe extensor group, splints the ankles for 2 weeks, and restricts weight bearing for the first 6 weeks. Radiographs are performed at 6 weeks to determine weight bearing status. The study involves only FDA approved implants with which the surgeon has established experience.

Timeline

• Start date: 2012-05-01
• Primary completion: 2026-05-01
• Completion: 2027-05-01
• First posted: 2012-06-15
• Last updated: 2025-04-08

Locations

6 sites across 1 country: United States