Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01610635
INTERVAL Study: To Determine Whether the Interval Between Blood Donations in England Can be Safely and Acceptably Decreased
A Randomised Trial to Determine Whether the Interval Between Blood Donations in England Can be Safely and Acceptably Decreased
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 50,000 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- University of Cambridge · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
It is hypothesised that the number of donations made by English blood donors will be greater with reduced vs. standard inter-donation intervals. The null hypothesis is that there will be no difference in donations between treatment groups; this may arise if reduced inter-donation intervals result in a greater number of donation deferrals (due to low haemoglobin) and/or an unacceptable burden to donors.
Detailed description
50,000 blood donors will be recruited from permanent blood donation centres across England to compare different intervals between blood donations to try to find the optimum interval for which it is safe for different donors to give blood. The study will look at whether intervals should be tailored by age, gender, genetic profile, and other characteristics. Study findings should help to improve the well-being of future blood donors in England and enhance the country's blood supplies.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| OTHER | Reduced versus standard intervals between blood donations | Over a period of two years participants will be invited to give blood either at usual donation intervals or more frequently. Men will be invited to donate every 12, 10 or 8 weeks and women every 16, 14 or 12 weeks. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-06-01
- Primary completion
- 2016-06-01
- Completion
- 2016-12-01
- First posted
- 2012-06-04
- Last updated
- 2015-06-10
Locations
25 sites across 1 country: United Kingdom
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01610635. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.