Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01607775
In-house Produced PMMA- Versus PEEK-cages
Clinical Characterization of In-house Produced PMMA-cages in Patients With Cervical Pathology
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 1 / Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 88 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Universitätsmedizin Mannheim · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Subsidence of cervical cages is a common problem. For the study, a new polyacrylmethacrylate cage was designed and prospectively implanted in patients with a mono- or bilevel cervical pathology. As control, a commercially available PEEK-cage was used, patients were randomized using minimization randomization, controlling for age and bone mineral densitiy. The investigators hypothesize that the newly developed cage has similar clinical and radiological qualities compared to the PEEK-cage, but at a much more favourable cost-performance ratio.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Implantation of a PEEK-cage | A commercially avaliable cuboid cervical cage will be implantet |
| DEVICE | PMMA-cage | The in-house produced cervical cage will be implanted |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2009-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-02-01
- Completion
- 2012-02-01
- First posted
- 2012-05-30
- Last updated
- 2012-06-05
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01607775. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.