Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01606657

Irrigation Versus no Irrigation for Cutaneous Abscess

Is Routine Irrigation of Cutaneous Abscesses Necessary?

Status
Completed
Phase
N/A
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
201 (actual)
Sponsor
University of California, San Francisco · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

In this study, the investigators are trying to find out if washing out the abscess (pocket of pus) with fluid will help, instead of only taking out the pus. Your care will be the same as usual, except that you will be selected randomly to have your abscess washed out with fluid, or not.

Detailed description

Irrigation of the abscess cavity is commonly described as part of the procedure of incision and drainage of cutaneous abscesses (1-4). Despite this, there are no randomized controlled trials that demonstrate the benefit of irrigation in treatment of these abscesses. Potential disadvantages of irrigation include increased procedural time, pain, increased cost with sterile irrigation solutions and materials to capture the irrigation effluent, and increased risk of microbiologic contamination of the surrounding area. The goal of this study is to examine patients undergoing incision and drainage of cutaneous abscesses to determine if irrigation of the abscess cavity affects the need for further interventions.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREIrrigationThe patient will receive irrigation as a part of their wound care
OTHERNo IrrigationThe patient will not receive irrigation as part of their wound care

Timeline

Start date
2010-08-01
Primary completion
2014-09-01
Completion
2015-04-01
First posted
2012-05-28
Last updated
2017-05-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01606657. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Irrigation Versus no Irrigation for Cutaneous Abscess (NCT01606657) · Clinical Trials Directory