Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01592942
Mesh Fixation in Lichtenstein Hernioplasty
A Randomized Multi-center Study of Tissue Glue Fixation of Optilene™ Mesh With Histoacryl™ or Self-gripping Parietex ProGrip™ Compared to Conventional Non-absorbable Suture Fixation of Ultrapro™ Mesh
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 650 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- Kuopio University Hospital · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
This is a prospective, randomized multi-centre study to find out most safe, feasible, painless and cost-effective mesh fixation method in inguinal hernia operation. Three mesh fixation techniques are compared to find out best technique in local anaesthesia Lichtenstein operation. Our hypothesis is that glue fixation is safe, simple and cheap method compared to conventional Lichtenstein technique.
Detailed description
Some 650 patients with inguinal hernia are operated using Lichtenstein operation in local anaesthesia. Mesh fixation is performed using 3 methods: Optilene™ mesh + cyanoacrylate glue (n=200), self-fixing Parietex Progrip™ mesh (n=200) and non-absorbable sutures with Ultrapro™ mesh (n=200). Operative time and pain scores, immediate postoperative outcome, quality-of-life and total costs are followed 1, 7, 30 days and 1 and 5 years postoperatively.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Histoacryl | cyanoacrylate glue fixation of mesh 1 ml |
| DEVICE | Progrip | self-gripping mesh |
| DEVICE | sutures (prolene 3-0) | non-absorbable suture fixation 3-0 |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2019-03-01
- Completion
- 2021-12-01
- First posted
- 2012-05-07
- Last updated
- 2020-12-17
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Finland
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01592942. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.