Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01587248
Use of Harmonic in Breast Surgery
Harmonic Scalpel vs. Electrocautery Dissection in Modified Radical Mastectomy: A Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 152 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Aga Khan University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- Female
- Age
- 16 Years – 80 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
To compare harmonic scalpel with electrocautery for outcomes i.e. estimated blood loss (EBL), operating time, drain Volume and drain Days, seroma formation, surgical site infection and postoperative pain in adult females undergoing MRM at a tertiary care hospital. We hypothesized that harmonic yields better outcome than electrocautery dissection.
Detailed description
In this randomized controlled trial, adult females who underwent MRM between April 2010 and July 2011 were randomized to receive either intervention A (harmonic scalpel) or B (electrocautery). The procedure was standardized except elevation of flaps and axillary dissection, that was performed as per randomization. Patients were followed up in clinic for four weeks. The outcomes were estimated blood loss (EBL), operating time, drain Volume and drain Days, complications (seroma, surgical site infection, hematoma and flap necrosis) and postoperative pain.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | Harmonic | Dissection with harmonic scalpel |
| PROCEDURE | electrocautery | Dissection in modified radical mastectomy |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-07-01
- Completion
- 2011-08-01
- First posted
- 2012-04-30
- Last updated
- 2012-04-30
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Pakistan
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01587248. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.