NCT01585662

Prospective Random Comparing Study on EUS-guided Pseudocyst Drainage by Naso-pancreatic Tube and Stents

Random Comparing Study on Two Different EUS-guided Pseudocyst Drainage Methods--Modified Naso-pancreatic Tube Drainage and Stents Drainage

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: Phase 4
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 30 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Xiaoyin Zhang · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 85 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

EUS-guided pseudocyst drainage has been used world widely. Now, most endoscopists tend to place several stents to drain the content of cyst into GI tract. In the investigators experience, a modified naso-pancreatic tube drainage was more safer, easier and cheaper than placement of stents. Moreover, none of pseudocysts(total 19) drained by this modified naso-pancreatic tube drainage method were found recurrent with a follow up period from 3 months-34 months. So, the investigators designed this prospective random comparing study to confirm the result.

Conditions

• Pancreatic Pseudocyst

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage	EUS-guided pancreatic pseudocyst drainage by one 8 French naso-pancreatic tube or 2-3 two pig tails- stents.

Timeline

• Start date: 2012-01-01
• Primary completion: 2014-12-01
• Completion: 2014-12-01
• First posted: 2012-04-26
• Last updated: 2012-04-26

Locations

1 site across 1 country: China