NCT01584193

Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Venous Access Port Implantation

Ultrasound-guided Subclavian Vein Puncture Versus Cephalic Vein Dissection for Totally Implantable Venous Access Port Implementation: a Single-center Controlled Randomized Superiority Trial

• Status: Withdrawn
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 0 (actual)
• Sponsor: University of Lausanne Hospitals · Academic / Other
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to compare two different surgical techniques for implementation of totally implantable central venous access ports. Ultrasound-guided suclavian vein puncture is compared to cephalic vein dissection.

Conditions

• Vascular Surgical Procedures

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Ultrasound-guided subclavian vein puncture	Central venous access port implementation through ultrasound-guided subclavian vein puncture and Seldinger technique
PROCEDURE	Cephalic vein dissection	Central venous access port implementation through cephalic vein dissection and cutdown

Timeline

• Start date: 2013-06-01
• Primary completion: 2014-12-01
• Completion: 2014-12-01
• First posted: 2012-04-24
• Last updated: 2018-10-23

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Switzerland