Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01579071
Efficacy and Safety of CO2 vs Room Air Insufflation During ESD for Gastric Tumor
A Randomized, Controlled, Double-blind Trial of the Efficacy and Safety of CO2 vs Room Air Insufflation During ESD for Gastric Tumor
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 4
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 110 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Gachon University Gil Medical Center · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 19 Years – 85 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Accepted
Summary
Insufflation is essential procedure to observe the lumen of gastrointestinal tract in gastroscopy or colonoscopy Currently, most of hospital in Korea are using room air for insufflation According to recent clinical studies have shown that carbon dioxide have better safe and reduce stomachache than room air when endoscopy and endoscopic procedure is performed. However, there was still no research data or study in Korea. In this study, the investigators will try to make comparison between Carbon dioxide and room air insufflation for endoscopic submucosal dissection for Gastric Tumor and investigate the efficacy and safety
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | CO2 or room air insufflation during ESD for gastric tumor | CO2 insufflation group : CO2 will be insufflated via the endoscope during procedure as needed, Room air insufflation group : Room air will be insufflated via the endoscope during procedure as needed |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2012-04-01
- Primary completion
- 2014-08-01
- Completion
- 2014-08-01
- First posted
- 2012-04-17
- Last updated
- 2015-02-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: South Korea
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01579071. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.