NCT01579045

Effect of Head and Gaze Position on Soft Toric Contact Lens Performance

• Status: Completed
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 24 (actual)
• Sponsor: Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc. · Industry
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 55 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

Primary Hypotheses: Senofilcon A will provide significantly less rotation with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 monthly . Etafilcon A will provide significantly less rotation with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 1 1 day . Etafilcon A will provide rotation with subjects a recumbent position non-inferior to nelfilcon A. A margin of 5 degrees will be used. Secondary Hypotheses: Senofilcon A will have significantly better monocular visual performance with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 monthly. Etafilcon A for astigmatism will have significantly better monocular visual performance with subjects in a recumbent position than Filcon II 3 1 day. Etafilcon A will have monocular visual performance with subjects in a recumbent position non-inferior nelfilcon A. A margin of 0.05 LogMAR will be used.

Conditions

• Astigmatism
• Myopia

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
DEVICE	senofilcon A	bilateral daily use soft contact lens
DEVICE	etafilcon A	bilateral daily use soft contact lens
DEVICE	nelfilcon A	bilateral daily use soft contact lens
DEVICE	Filcon II 3	bilateral daily use soft contact lens
DEVICE	Filcon II 3	bilateral daily use soft contact lenses

Timeline

• Start date: 2012-08-01
• Primary completion: 2013-03-01
• Completion: 2013-03-01
• First posted: 2012-04-17
• Last updated: 2018-06-19
• Results posted: 2014-10-03

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United Kingdom