Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01573117
A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Rapid Induction of Cooling in Stroke Patients, Cold Infusions vs. RhinoChill (iCOOL 1)
iCOOL 1 (Induction of COOLing 1): A Randomized Trial Comparing 2 Methods for Rapid Induction of Cooling in Stroke Patients, Cold Infusions vs. RhinoChill
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 20 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University Hospital Heidelberg · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Mild hypothermia improves outcome in patients with global cerebral ischemia after cardiac arrest. Hypothermia seems promising also in other acute hypoxic-ischemic or in brain swelling associated cerebrovascular disease. The narrow-time-frame is a major issue ("time is brain"). To provide immediate cooling without delay, easy to use, mobile and effective methods are needed. Cold infusions (4 °C) are an accepted standard worldwide. The RhinoChill (BeneChill, USA) is a new device. A comparison of these two induction methods has never been done before. Neither was the effect of cold infusions on brain-temperature measured. For the first time iCOOL 1 compares feasibility, safety and efficacy of the two methods.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DEVICE | RhinoChill | Nasopharyngeal cooling with the RhinoChill device |
| DRUG | Cold crystalloid infusions, 0.9%NaCl or Ringer's solution | Infusion of 2L cold crystalloid solution (4°C) over 30 minutes |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2010-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2011-11-01
- First posted
- 2012-04-06
- Last updated
- 2012-04-26
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Germany
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01573117. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.