Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01567852
Use of Ketamine vs Methohexital for Electroconvulsive Therapy (ECT) on Patient Recovery and Re-orientation Time
The Use of Ketamine Versus Methohexital for Electroconvulsive Therapy: A Cross-Over Comparative Study on Patient Recovery and Re-Orientation Time
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 20 (actual)
- Sponsor
- University of New Mexico · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- —
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
When undergoing ECT treatments, patient recovery time and re-orientation time may be shorter using ketamine for induction than using methohexital.
Detailed description
ECT treatments are done under general anesthesia, and the induction is commonly done with methohexital. We will study whether using ketamine as an induction agent will result in a faster recovery time and quicker re-orientation time compared to using methohexital.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| DRUG | Ketamine | Ketamine (1.5mg/kg) will be given for induction, with room to titrate up to induction effect |
| DRUG | Methohexital | Methohexital (1.5mg/kg) will be given for induction |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-03-01
- Completion
- 2013-03-01
- First posted
- 2012-03-30
- Last updated
- 2014-12-30
- Results posted
- 2014-12-30
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01567852. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.