Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01506531
Silo Versus Primary Closure for Gastroschisis
Bedside Silo Versus Attempted Operative Closure for Gastroschisis
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- N/A
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 38 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 5 Minutes – 2 Days
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The objective of this study is to scientifically evaluate two different closure strategies for gastroschisis to determine if there is a difference in the two approaches.
Detailed description
The hypothesis is that there is no difference between bedside silo placement and operative closure in return of bowel function, ventilator dependence, or length of stay. The primary outcome variable between the two techniques will be length of hospitalization. The likely variables will be length of time to meet discharge criteria, length of hospitalization, time to full feedings, time on mechanical ventilation and total hospital charges.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | silo for gastroschisis | silo placed around abdominal contents in gastroschisis patients |
| PROCEDURE | Primary closure of gastroschisis | Primary closure of gastroschisis, if possible |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-08-01
- Primary completion
- 2018-01-01
- Completion
- 2018-04-01
- First posted
- 2012-01-10
- Last updated
- 2019-01-10
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01506531. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.