Clinical Trials Directory

Trials / Completed

CompletedNCT01438203

Thrust Manipulation Versus Non-Thrust Manipulation

Early Use of Thrust Manipulation Versus Non-Thrust Manipulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
149 (actual)
Sponsor
Walsh University · Academic / Other
Sex
All
Age
18 Years
Healthy volunteers
Not accepted

Summary

The objective of this study is to investigate the comparative benefit of thrust and non-thrust manipulation on a population of patients with low back pain. The investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in 4 week outcomes or greater, between the two groups.

Detailed description

Thrust manipulation is considered traditional spinal manipulation. Nonthrust manipulation is considered mobilization. The mobilization will be used in a similar manner as in clinical practice and this differs from past studies.

Conditions

Interventions

TypeNameDescription
PROCEDUREThrust manipulationThrust manipulation is a passive procedure which involves a high velocity low amplitude thrust to the spinal region
PROCEDURENon-thrust manipulationNon-thrust manipulation involves a low amplitude, low speed mobilization to the targeted region while adjusting the procedure based on patient feedback

Timeline

Start date
2011-02-01
Primary completion
2012-02-01
Completion
2012-02-01
First posted
2011-09-22
Last updated
2012-09-05

Locations

1 site across 1 country: United States

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01438203. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.

Thrust Manipulation Versus Non-Thrust Manipulation (NCT01438203) · Clinical Trials Directory