Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01438203
Thrust Manipulation Versus Non-Thrust Manipulation
Early Use of Thrust Manipulation Versus Non-Thrust Manipulation: A Randomized Clinical Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 2
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 149 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Walsh University · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The objective of this study is to investigate the comparative benefit of thrust and non-thrust manipulation on a population of patients with low back pain. The investigators hypothesize that there will be no difference in 4 week outcomes or greater, between the two groups.
Detailed description
Thrust manipulation is considered traditional spinal manipulation. Nonthrust manipulation is considered mobilization. The mobilization will be used in a similar manner as in clinical practice and this differs from past studies.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Thrust manipulation | Thrust manipulation is a passive procedure which involves a high velocity low amplitude thrust to the spinal region |
| PROCEDURE | Non-thrust manipulation | Non-thrust manipulation involves a low amplitude, low speed mobilization to the targeted region while adjusting the procedure based on patient feedback |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-02-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-02-01
- Completion
- 2012-02-01
- First posted
- 2011-09-22
- Last updated
- 2012-09-05
Locations
1 site across 1 country: United States
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01438203. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.