NCT01419808

Vascularized Versus Non-Vascularized Bone Grafts in Treating Proximal Pole Scaphoid Non Unions

Vascularized vs. Non-vascularized Bone Grafting in the Treatment of Proximal Pole Scaphoid Non Unions: A Prospective Randomized Trial

• Status: Unknown
• Phase: N/A
• Study type: Interventional
• Enrollment: 40 (estimated)
• Sponsor: Hand and Upper Limb Clinic, Canada · Network
• Sex: All
• Age: 18 Years – 75 Years
• Healthy volunteers: Not accepted

Summary

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether treatment of scaphoid non-unions with a vascularized bone grafts improves patient reported pain and disability compared to treatment with a non-vascularized bone graft. Secondary objectives are to examine if there is any difference in the overall rate and time to union, range of motion, grip strength, or complication rates between the two groups. In addition, this is the first prospective randomized study to directly compare the two techniques. This is also the first study to use standardized methods of assessing union (based on computerized tomography), standardized methods of collecting objective patient data, and utilizing validated patient questionnaires to assess pain and disability.

Conditions

• Scaphoid Non-Unions

Interventions

Type	Name	Description
PROCEDURE	Vascularized Bone Graft	Vascularized bone graft in the treatment of Scaphoid Non-Union
PROCEDURE	Non-Vascularized Bone Graft	Non-Vascularized Bone Graft in the treatment of Scaphoid Non-unions

Timeline

• Start date: 2007-09-01
• Primary completion: 2012-07-01
• Completion: 2012-07-01
• First posted: 2011-08-18
• Last updated: 2011-08-18

Locations

1 site across 1 country: Canada