Trials / Completed
CompletedNCT01413867
Safety and Short Term Effectiveness of EEA Versus PPH Stapler for III Degree Hemorrhoids
Safety and Short Term Effectiveness of EEA Stapler vs PPH Stapler in the Treatment of III Degree Haemorrhoids. Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
- Status
- Completed
- Phase
- Phase 3
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 120 (actual)
- Sponsor
- Societa Italiana di Chirurgia ColoRettale · Network
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 18 Years – 70 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
Stapled hemorrhoidopexy has gained wide acceptability among colorectal surgeons because of less postoperative pain compared with excisional surgery, however a still relevant percentage of postoperative bleedings and long-term hemorrhoid recurrence are reported. A new stapler device has been designed to overcome these drawbacks by modifying the stapled sutures and by increasing the space for mucosal resection in the case of the stapler. This randomized controlled study was aimed to demonstrate whether the new EEA stapler Covidien was able to resect more quantity of prolapsed mucosa than the traditional PPH 01/03 Ethicol Endosurgery by measuring the surface of the resected specimen and to demonstrate if the modified stapled sutures can ensure better intraoperative hemostasis by measuring the number of overstitches required to get perfect hemostasis during the operation.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | stapled hemorrhoidopexy | stapled hemorrhoidopexy will be performed using the EEA stapler Covidien |
| PROCEDURE | stapled hemorrhoidopexy | stapled hemorrhoidopexy will be performed using the PPH01/03 Ethicon EndoSurgery |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-03-01
- Primary completion
- 2013-12-01
- Completion
- 2013-12-01
- First posted
- 2011-08-10
- Last updated
- 2013-12-11
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Italy
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01413867. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.