Trials / Unknown
UnknownNCT01398579
Comparison Between Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, White-light Endoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy
Prospective Comparison Between Probe-based Confocal Laser Endomicroscopy, White-light Endoscopy and Virtual Chromoendoscopy for the Diagnosis of Gastric Pre-neoplastic and Neoplastic Lesions (pCLE-GCEP)
- Status
- Unknown
- Phase
- Phase 1
- Study type
- Interventional
- Enrollment
- 20 (estimated)
- Sponsor
- National University Hospital, Singapore · Academic / Other
- Sex
- All
- Age
- 50 Years – 90 Years
- Healthy volunteers
- Not accepted
Summary
The investigators hypothesis that 1. clinical applicability and overall diagnostic sensitivity and specificity of pCLE for diagnosing gastric preneoplastic and neoplastic lesions is acceptable 2. pCLE, as compared to white-light endoscopy (WLE), AFI and magnifying NBI has higher sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosing gastric pre-neoplastic and neoplastic lesions
Detailed description
Patients will be recruited from an ongoing study - Gastric Cancer Epidemiology, Clinical and Genetic Programme Cohort Study (GCEP). GCEP is a prospective cohort study aiming to enroll 3,000 Singapore- Chinese subjects aged \>50 years, and offers screening by endoscopy and systematic follow-up for a minimum of 5 years. 20 patients will be randomized into two groups. All of them will be examined using four different endoscopy imaging technologies by one trained specialist. 10 patients will be in group A and another 10 patients will be in group B. Group A: WLE followed by AFI followed by NBI followed by pCLE. Group B: WLE followed by NBI followed by AFI followed by pCLE. The difference between two groups is the sequence of two endoscopy imaging modes - AFI and NBI. Diagnosis made during NBI and AFI must be made based on pre-defined criteria, and should not be influenced by the preceding imaging modality. To control for the possible bias on the third imaging modality caused by influence from the preceding imaging modality, patients are randomized to receive NBI before AFI or AFI before NBI. Endoscopic diagnosis will be made for each suspected lesion with every imaging modality. The biopsy of lesions will be taken after pCLE examination is completed and sent for histology. In the absence of suspicious lesions, the area of examination will be as follows (as stated in main GCEP protocol): * A1- lesser curvature of the antrum, within 2-3cm of the pylorus. * A2- greater curvature of the antrum, within 2-3cm of the pylorus. * IA- incisura angularis. * B1- lesser curvature of the corpus, 4cm proximal to the angulus. * B2- middle portion of the greater curvature of the corpus, 8cm from the cardia. * Cardia (C) - within 1 cm below the OGJ (defined as the point where gastric folds disappear). The results will be compared with the gold standard diagnosis - histopathology diagnosis. The sensitivity and specificity for each imaging tool will be calculated accordingly.
Conditions
Interventions
| Type | Name | Description |
|---|---|---|
| PROCEDURE | Gastroscopy | 20 patients will be randomized into two groups. All of them will be examined using four different endoscopy imaging technologies by one trained specialist. 10 patients will be in group A and another 10 patients will be in group B. Group A: WLE followed by AFI followed by NBI followed by pCLE. Group B: WLE followed by NBI followed by AFI followed by pCLE. |
Timeline
- Start date
- 2011-09-01
- Primary completion
- 2012-09-01
- Completion
- 2012-09-01
- First posted
- 2011-07-20
- Last updated
- 2012-07-12
Locations
1 site across 1 country: Singapore
Source: ClinicalTrials.gov record NCT01398579. Inclusion in this directory is not an endorsement.